BELLINGS

Office Market Headwinds: Underwriting in a Post-Pandemic World

The office market faces structural demand uncertainty following the widespread adoption of hybrid and remote work — creating significant underwriting challenges for lenders assessing office loan credit risk.

Published

The office real estate market is navigating one of the most significant structural disruptions in its history. The widespread adoption of remote and hybrid work following the COVID-19 pandemic has materially reduced aggregate office demand in most major markets, increased vacancy rates to multi-decade highs in many cities, and created profound uncertainty about the long-term equilibrium for office space utilization — all of which has complicated CRE lending to office properties.

Office vacancy is a lagging indicator of demand, because lease expirations — not pandemic-driven work-from-home decisions — drive vacancy in the near term. Long-term lease tenants may be paying rent on offices that are physically underutilized while their leases remain outstanding. As these leases expire — a wave that accelerated through 2023–2026 — the underlying reduction in demand becomes visible in rising vacancy and declining effective rents. Lenders underwriting office properties must assess not just current occupancy, but the lease rollover schedule and the likelihood of lease renewal versus contraction.

The bifurcation of the office market is acute. Trophy and Class A office properties — newly constructed, well-amenitized buildings in the best locations — have maintained stronger occupancy relative to older, commodity Class B and C buildings. Tenants downsizing overall footprint are often upgrading to better-quality space at lower total cost. This "flight to quality" has concentrated distress in older vintage office and in suburban markets where the value proposition relative to working from home is weakest.

Office lenders in the current environment typically require substantially more conservative underwriting than pre-pandemic norms: lower LTVs (50–60% vs. 65–70% historically), higher DSCR minimums, meaningful cash equity requirements, and lower tolerance for properties with near-term lease rollover risk. Many lenders have effectively exited the office market entirely, particularly for suburban properties or buildings with major lease expirations within the loan term.

For credit analysts assessing existing office loans in portfolios, key questions include: What percentage of leases expire within the next 3 years? What is the implied market rent for renewal vs. current in-place rent? What is the estimated capital cost per square foot to attract tenants to the space? And what is the "as-vacant" value — the property's value if it were unable to re-lease — compared to the outstanding loan balance?